Titled
swiggityswagurfab:






This guy would survive a horror movie.

This guy would survive a horror movie.

Every single time this comes up on my dash it gets funnier. Like I just fell of of my bed from laughing so hard

He hit him with a lamp. 

I love his freedom pants.

im crying omg

swiggityswagurfab:


This guy would survive a horror movie.

This guy would survive a horror movie.

Every single time this comes up on my dash it gets funnier. Like I just fell of of my bed from laughing so hard

He hit him with a lamp.

I love his freedom pants.

im crying omg

delilahsdawson:

zakkorama:

mechanicbird:

eroticmirotic:

timemachineyeah:

 

I’ve said this before and I’ll point it out again - 

Menstruation is caused by change in hormonal levels to stop the creation of a uterine lining and encourage the body to flush the lining out. The body does this by lowering estrogen levels and raising testosterone. 

Or, to put it more plainly “That time of the month” is when female hormones most closely resemble male hormones. So if (cis) women aren’t suited to office at “That time of the month” then (cis) men are NEVER suited to office.

If you are a dude and don’t dig the ladies around you at their time of the month, just think! That is you all of the time. 

And, on a final note, post-menopausal (cis) women are the most hormonally stable of all human demographics. They have fewer hormonal fluctuations of anyone, meaning older women like Hilary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren would theoretically be among the least likely candidates to make an irrational decision due to hormonal fluctuations, and if we were basing our leadership decisions on hormone levels, then only women over fifty should ever be allowed to hold office. 

Reblogging hard for that last comment.

I WANTED TO SAY THIS BUT THEN SOMEONE ELSE DID and I’m damn proud.

Heeeeeee.

I approve of both points. Period = NUCLEAR BOMB IN MY BELLY, and JESUS, CAN WE PLEASE HAVE A WOMAN PRESIDENT NOW WITHOUT CONSIDERING HER MAXIPADS.

tastefullyoffensive:

[mrlovenstein]
wintry-mix:

siddharthasmama:

distanceschmistance:

We went over this in Semantics
I have been perpetually angry ever since

no double standards there, nope, no blatant misogyny/woman shaming here, nuh uh, none at all.

The most infuriating thing about this is that the 3 (THREE) terms listed as “positive expressions for a sexually active woman” are actually nothing of the sort. “Hot,” “sexy,” and “MILF” have zero to do with a woman’s level of sexual activity; they’re about a woman’s status as an object of sexual desire.
"MILF" stands for "mom I’d like to fuck,” for God’s sake. The agency there ain’t exactly the mom’s.
And “hot” and “sexy” are gender-neutral words. We call men hot and sexy all the time. So why aren’t they on the “positive expressions for a sexually active man” list? Oh, that’s right, because that list is full of terms that actually ARE positive expressions for sexually active men.

wintry-mix:

siddharthasmama:

distanceschmistance:

We went over this in Semantics

I have been perpetually angry ever since

no double standards there, nope, no blatant misogyny/woman shaming here, nuh uh, none at all.

The most infuriating thing about this is that the 3 (THREE) terms listed as “positive expressions for a sexually active woman” are actually nothing of the sort. “Hot,” “sexy,” and “MILF” have zero to do with a woman’s level of sexual activity; they’re about a woman’s status as an object of sexual desire.

"MILF" stands for "mom I’d like to fuck,” for God’s sake. The agency there ain’t exactly the mom’s.

And “hot” and “sexy” are gender-neutral words. We call men hot and sexy all the time. So why aren’t they on the “positive expressions for a sexually active man” list? Oh, that’s right, because that list is full of terms that actually ARE positive expressions for sexually active men.

bookishandi:

padfootstolemycrumpet:


fuckyeahteddylupin:


Same mirror - same place - different orphan by *button-bird


*strangled cry*


NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO.
 
But also YES.
 
Because for me this is a pretty important part of the final battle. A lot of folks accused JKR of just wanting to kill people off, and Lupin and Tonks were one of the major “sins” in that category. But for me, one of the major themes of her books is vicious cycle of violence, and another is the ways ordinary people can break that cycle. It’s important that we know that Harry doesn’t stop all the pain, that he’s not the last war orphan. Just like the first War, parents and adults have to make choices, choices with consequences. 
 
Like James and Lily, Lupin and Tonks didn’t risk their lives to defeat Voldemort. They gave their lives for each other, because no one person should bear the weight of the sacrifice. They gave their lives for their son, who deserved a better world. They gave their lives for love, not for victory.
 
I think it’s important to see the ways Voldemort’s evil creates these cycles, children taken from their parents and parents taken from their children, again and again. I think it’s an important sobering note in the victory—yes, this time Voldemort is really dead, but there’s another baby this time, another infant who will never know his beautiful, wonderful parents because of Voldemort and his message of hate and violence. Another child who will grow up wondering where he came from, what his parents were like, what would be different if they were alive.
 
But it’s also beautiful that Teddy will have such a different experience. And his experience will not be different because Voldemort is “really gone.” His experience will be different because his grandmother will tell him about his brilliant mom. Because Harry will tell him about his wonderful dad. Because Harry will help him deal with his pain and loss, be a sympathetic ear who understands what it’s like to grow up without your parents. Because the Weasleys will welcome him as another grandchild, and he’ll grow up with Victoire to throw dirt at, and James as a little brother. His experience won’t be different because Harry won a war, it will be different because of love.
 
That’s the whole story of Harry Potter. Sometimes we have to fight for what’s right, but what really makes life worth living and what really changes the world isn’t magic or power or moral superiority. It’s love.

bookishandi:

padfootstolemycrumpet:

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO.
 
But also YES.
 
Because for me this is a pretty important part of the final battle. A lot of folks accused JKR of just wanting to kill people off, and Lupin and Tonks were one of the major “sins” in that category. But for me, one of the major themes of her books is vicious cycle of violence, and another is the ways ordinary people can break that cycle. It’s important that we know that Harry doesn’t stop all the pain, that he’s not the last war orphan. Just like the first War, parents and adults have to make choices, choices with consequences.
 
Like James and Lily, Lupin and Tonks didn’t risk their lives to defeat Voldemort. They gave their lives for each other, because no one person should bear the weight of the sacrifice. They gave their lives for their son, who deserved a better world. They gave their lives for love, not for victory.
 
I think it’s important to see the ways Voldemort’s evil creates these cycles, children taken from their parents and parents taken from their children, again and again. I think it’s an important sobering note in the victory—yes, this time Voldemort is really dead, but there’s another baby this time, another infant who will never know his beautiful, wonderful parents because of Voldemort and his message of hate and violence. Another child who will grow up wondering where he came from, what his parents were like, what would be different if they were alive.
 
But it’s also beautiful that Teddy will have such a different experience. And his experience will not be different because Voldemort is “really gone.” His experience will be different because his grandmother will tell him about his brilliant mom. Because Harry will tell him about his wonderful dad. Because Harry will help him deal with his pain and loss, be a sympathetic ear who understands what it’s like to grow up without your parents. Because the Weasleys will welcome him as another grandchild, and he’ll grow up with Victoire to throw dirt at, and James as a little brother. His experience won’t be different because Harry won a war, it will be different because of love.
 
That’s the whole story of Harry Potter. Sometimes we have to fight for what’s right, but what really makes life worth living and what really changes the world isn’t magic or power or moral superiority. It’s love.

amaronith:

spiralwaves:

doortotomorrow:

heyitsthatsean:

blizooka:

heyitsthatsean:

bespectacledsquid:

unholyglee:

here-come-the-drums014:

lotsofeverything:

joshuascottchaney:

minorfour:

Anyone else notice Mushu the dragon is Mulan’s tattoo…?

This is the coolest shit I have ever seen.

Let’s not forget this one

thinking-of-a-mermaid-lagoon:  heroofnurserygames:  thinking-of-a-mermaid-lagoon:  heroofnurserygames:      *smirk*  *slowly stops crying and looks at him* You are absolutely ridiculous. *giggle*  Im wonderful!  Yes, I suppose you can be both.  O_O It’s so awesome.

…this is the first time I’ve seen disney princess stuff that I’d actually want as prints. Also, part of me is glad Tiana’s not in this bunch bc there’s only so much potential to be wrong-headed about things from my cultural background I can take in a day. But if this artist actually got it? Tiana, queen of the zombies would be amazing.

anyone else notice how mulan is the avatar

Oh god.

except that tiana is indeed in this series and she’s the best fucking one period

actually shit they left out kida, tiana, pocahontas, rapunzel and maid marian

image

image

image

image

image

Holy shitballs!

Disney seen through a darker lens. I love it. I can’t choose a favourite. 

source your shit, people. this is jeftoon1's twisted princesses series. it’s worth taking a look at his gallery because 1) the pictures aren’t cropped, and 2) he’s written little stories for each image telling how each lady came to be the way she is in the image. also he did vanellope and that’s in his gallery too!

Reblogging again for source information

This… Is awesome

ancamnarvienn:

Star Trek + Social Commentary (context in the captions)

THIS is what the original Star Trek TV series and films were about. Not just about blowing up things in space and snazzy lens flares with a side order of casual sexism -.-‘.

tamorapierce:

Makes a person proud to be Amurrican, dudn’t it?  ::leans to side, spits::

lejacquelope:

portugoose:

nickiminajpooping:

pleatedjeans:

via



*slow clap the fuck outta this shit*

AWESOMEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

lejacquelope:

portugoose:

nickiminajpooping:

pleatedjeans:

via

image

*slow clap the fuck outta this shit*

AWESOMEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!